Qviding FIF44 – 1Torslanda IK1

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Qviding's strong H2H dominance, especially at home, and Torslanda's poor away win rate give Qviding a slight edge despite similar overall form.

• Qviding won 4 of last 5 H2H meetings, including 2-1 away in May 2026.
• Qviding home record: 3W-2D-3L, 18 goals scored, 16 conceded in 8 home matches.
• Torslanda away record: 2W-5D-1L, 15 goals scored, 9 conceded in 8 away matches.
• Qviding last 5 form: L-D-W-L-W (7 points); Torslanda last 5: L-W-W-D-D (8 points).

BetBugs · Match WinnerwonQviding FIFEstimated chance45%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Combining Qviding's home resilience and Torslanda's away struggles, Qviding or Draw is a strong double chance.

• Qviding have not lost at home to Torslanda in listed H2H history.
• Torslanda have only 2 away wins in 8 matches this season.
• Qviding home record: 3W-2D-3L, with 5 of 8 home games seeing Qviding avoid defeat.

BetBugs · Double ChancewonQviding FIF or DrawEstimated chance70%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams have high-scoring tendencies, especially Qviding at home, making Over 2.5 goals likely.

• Qviding home matches average 4.25 total goals (18 scored, 16 conceded in 8 games).
• Torslanda away matches average 3.0 total goals (15 scored, 9 conceded in 8 games).
• Qviding overall average 3.94 goals per game (34 scored, 33 conceded in 17 games).
• Last H2H meeting produced 3 goals.

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams consistently find the net and concede, supporting BTTS Yes.

• Qviding scored in 7 of 8 home matches this season.
• Torslanda scored in 7 of 8 away matches this season.
• Qviding conceded in 7 of 8 home matches; Torslanda conceded in 6 of 8 away matches.
• Both teams scored in 4 of Qviding's last 5 home matches.

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

First-half scoring rates suggest a moderate chance of Over 1.5 goals, but confidence is low due to variability.

• Qviding average 0.8 first-half goals scored and 0.8 conceded per match.
• Torslanda average 0.9 first-half goals scored and 0.8 conceded per match.
• Combined first-half goal average is 1.7 per match.
• Qviding led at half-time in 33% of matches; Torslanda led in 33% and trailed in 40%.

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

Second halves tend to produce more goals for both teams, especially Qviding, making Over 1.5 second-half goals plausible.

• Qviding average 1.0 second-half goals scored (1.8 total - 0.8 first-half).
• Torslanda average 0.8 second-half goals scored (1.7 total - 0.9 first-half).
• Qviding concede 1.2 second-half goals on average (2.0 total - 0.8 first-half).
• Torslanda concede 0.5 second-half goals on average (1.3 total - 0.8 first-half).

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Without specific corner stats, this is a speculative market based on league averages; confidence is low.

• Corner data is unavailable for both teams in recent matches.
• Both teams average 0 corners in provided data, indicating missing information.
• Division 2 matches typically average around 9-10 corners per game.

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Card data is missing, so this is a neutral estimate based on league norms; confidence is low.

• Card data is unavailable for both teams in recent matches.
• Both teams average 0 yellow cards in provided data, indicating missing information.
• Division 2 matches typically average around 3-4 cards per game.