Sint-Truiden
BetBugs 47% · Market 60.6%
No edge exists here — the market prices Sint-Truiden at 61% implied while our model sits at 47%, so the odds already overstate the home thesis.
Jupiler Pro LeagueFull time
Predictions gradedPre-match view
Sint-Truiden have the better baseline numbers (1.9 scored, 1.3 conceded vs Westerlo's 2.1 conceded) and the model leans home-or-draw, Over 2.5 and BTTS Yes — but the head-to-head (away side won 4 of the last 5, including 3-0 and 4-0) and Taniguchi/Muja availability doubts cap confidence.
Critically, every mainstream price is shorter than fair value (home win 1.65 vs 47% estimate; Over 2.5 at 1.40 vs 62%), so the actionable takeaway is no value on the favourites — the only high-confidence call is Win to Nil Home: No.
Compare BetBugs' chances with the market's.
Other edges · 5
The published chance does not exceed the market's implied chance.
Sint-TruidenBetBugs 47% · Market 60.6%
No edge exists here — the market prices Sint-Truiden at 61% implied while our model sits at 47%, so the odds already overstate the home thesis.
BetBugs 72% · Market 84.7%
At 85% implied versus our 72% estimate, the draw-inclusive home cover is priced well beyond fair value and offers no genuine mispricing.
BetBugs 70% · Market 84.7%
The 1.18 quote implies 85% while our first-half model gives 70%, a 15-point negative gap that removes any value.
How likely BetBugs thought each outcome was.
High-risk markets where price or context leaves too little cushion.
Implied 61% leaves no cushion versus our 47% estimate; the price already reflects the home thesis and the H2H pattern points the other way.
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF-GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Sint-Truiden | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 12-10 | 8 |
| 13 | Westerlo | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 13-16 | 7 |

