Shkendija Tetovo00 – 0Hibernian0

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Hibernian holds a first-leg advantage and has shown slightly better recent form in competitive matches, giving them a moderate edge to win again.

• Hibernian won the first leg 2-1 at home on 2026-08-06.
• Hibernian's last 5 matches: W-L-W-L-W (3 wins, 2 losses).
• Shkendija's last 5 matches: L-W-W-L-W (3 wins, 2 losses).
• Hibernian averaged 1.6 goals scored and 1.2 conceded over last 15; Shkendija 1.7 scored and 1.3 conceded.

BetBugs · Match WinnerlostHibernianEstimated chance45%

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Hibernian's superior first-half scoring average gives them a slight edge, but the low probability reflects the high chance of a draw at the break.

• Hibernian led at halftime in 40% of last 15 matches; Shkendija in 20%.
• Hibernian's first-half goals per game: 1.1; Shkendija's: 0.5.
• First leg was 0-0 at halftime.
• Shkendija trailed at halftime in 20% of matches; Hibernian trailed in 33%.

BetBugs · First Half WinnerlostHibernianEstimated chance35%

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

A repeat of the first-leg pattern is possible, but the low probability acknowledges the difficulty of predicting exact halftime/fulltime combinations.

• First leg: 0-0 at HT, Hibernian won 2-1.
• Hibernian won 3 of last 5 matches when drawing at halftime (small sample).
• Shkendija drew at halftime in 60% of last 15 matches.
• Hibernian's second-half goal difference: +0.5 per game; Shkendija's: +0.2.

BetBugs · Ht Ft DoublelostDraw / HibernianEstimated chance25%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams have been involved in high-scoring games recently, and the first leg saw three goals, suggesting another match with over 2.5 goals.

• First leg ended 2-1 (3 total goals).
• Shkendija's last 5 matches: 3, 4, 3, 3, 1 goals (avg 2.8 total).
• Hibernian's last 5 matches: 3, 3, 5, 3, 1 goals (avg 3.0 total).
• Both teams scored in 4 of Shkendija's last 5 and 3 of Hibernian's last 5.

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Both sides have consistent scoring records and defensive vulnerabilities, making it likely that each team finds the net.

• Both teams scored in the first leg (2-1).
• Shkendija scored in 4 of their last 5 matches; Hibernian scored in 4 of their last 5.
• Shkendija conceded in 4 of last 5; Hibernian conceded in 4 of last 5.
• Shkendija's home matches: scored in 4 of last 5, conceded in 3 of last 5.

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Despite a goalless first half in the first leg, Hibernian's strong first-half scoring trend and the tie's urgency should produce at least one goal before the break.

• First leg had 0 first-half goals.
• Shkendija's last 5 first halves: 0, 2, 1, 1, 0 goals (avg 0.8).
• Hibernian's last 5 first halves: 0, 1, 3, 2, 3 goals (avg 1.8).
• Hibernian led at halftime in 40% of recent matches; Shkendija in 20%.

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

Limited corner data, but Hibernian's matches often feature high corner counts, and the open nature of the tie could push the total over 8.5.

• First leg: 7 corners total (Hibernian 4, Shkendija 3).
• Hibernian's last 5 with corner data: 11, 9, 7, 3, 5 (avg 7.0).
• Shkendija's only recent corner data: 3 corners in first leg.
• Hibernian averaged 3.8 corners per game over last 15; Shkendija 3.0.