Landvetter IS11 – 0Dalstorps IF0

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Landvetter's strong home form and 5-match winning streak give them an edge, but Dalstorp's two 1-0 wins over Landvetter this season (including at this venue) and solid away record suggest a tight contest, capping home win probability.

• Landvetter IS have won their last 5 league matches, scoring 12 and conceding 2.
• Home record this season: 6 wins, 0 draws, 1 loss, with 11 goals scored and only 3 conceded.
• Dalstorps IF away record: 2 wins, 3 draws, 1 loss, conceding 8 in 6 matches.

BetBugs · Match WinnerwonLandvetter ISEstimated chance45%

Signal quality High · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Landvetter's dominant home record and overall form make them unlikely to lose, while Dalstorp's away struggles to win consistently support a home-or-draw double chance.

• Landvetter IS have lost only 1 of 7 home matches this season.
• Dalstorps IF have won only 2 of 6 away matches, with 3 draws.
• Landvetter's last 15 matches: 11 wins, 1 draw, 2 losses.

BetBugs · Double ChancewonLandvetter IS or DrawEstimated chance75%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

Despite Dalstorp's higher halftime lead rate, Landvetter's recent form and the H2H 0-0 halftime scores suggest a cautious start, favoring a draw at the break.

• Landvetter led at halftime in only 20% of matches; Dalstorp led in 53%.
• Landvetter's last 5 matches: 2 halftime leads, 3 draws.
• Dalstorp's last 5 matches: 3 halftime leads, 2 draws.

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

A tight first half is expected, but Landvetter's strong second-half performances at home could break the deadlock, though the low probability reflects the difficulty of predicting exact HT/FT combinations.

• Landvetter have won 5 of 7 home matches, often scoring in the second half.
• Dalstorp have drawn 3 of 6 away matches at halftime.
• Landvetter's second-half goal difference is +0.6 per game.

BetBugs · Ht Ft DoublewonDraw / Landvetter ISEstimated chance25%

Signal quality High · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

The H2H pattern of low-scoring 1-0 results, combined with Landvetter's strong home defense (0.43 goals conceded per game) and Dalstorp's tendency for tight away matches, strongly points to under 2.5 goals.

• Both 2026 H2H meetings ended 1-0, with clean sheets for the winner.
• Landvetter's home matches average 2.0 total goals (11 scored, 3 conceded in 7 games).
• Dalstorp's away matches average 3.0 total goals, but 4 of 6 had under 2.5 goals.

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Landvetter's defensive solidity at home and Dalstorp's occasional away blanks, reinforced by the H2H clean sheet pattern, make both teams scoring unlikely.

• Landvetter kept clean sheets in 5 of their last 7 home matches.
• Dalstorp failed to score in 2 of their last 5 away matches.
• Both H2H meetings this season saw one team fail to score.

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

Landvetter's exceptional home defensive record (0.43 goals conceded per game) and Dalstorp's occasional away scoring struggles support a home clean sheet.

• Landvetter kept clean sheets in 5 of 7 home matches this season.
• Dalstorp failed to score in 2 of 6 away matches, including a 0-0 draw.
• Landvetter conceded only 3 goals in 7 home games.

BetBugs · Team to ScorewonDalstorps IF not to scoreEstimated chance55%

Signal quality High · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams have low first-half scoring averages and the H2H matches were goalless at the break, making under 1.5 first-half goals highly probable.

• Landvetter's first-half goals per game: 0.7, first-half goals conceded: 0.4.
• Dalstorp's first-half goals per game: 0.9, first-half goals conceded: 0.3.
• Both H2H matches were 0-0 at halftime.

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

In the absence of corner stats, the expected low-event nature of the match and both teams' defensive tendencies support under 9.5 corners, though confidence is low due to missing data.

• Corner data is unavailable for both teams, but low-scoring matches often correlate with fewer corners.
• Landvetter's defensive style and Dalstorp's cautious away approach suggest limited attacking width.