NBATerminat

Predicții evaluate

New York Knicks109Washington Wizards111

joi 8 oct. 2026, 23:30 Predicții evaluateMadison Square GardenPresezon

Predicții11–1444%

Puncte pe perioadă: New York Knicks și Washington Wizards.
Echipă	S1	S2	S3	S4
New York Knicks	29	34	21	25
Washington Wizards	30	27	24	30

Pe scurt

Perspectiva dinaintea meciului

The Knicks have a slight edge in the full-game winner forecast, but Washington’s direct preseason win and camp additions are the strongest counterargument.

No player forecasts are supported, and rotation uncertainty keeps confidence low.

Context

Washington’s reported camp absences for Alex Sarr, Tristan Vukčević and Khris Middleton create frontcourt and wing uncertainty, while New York’s set starting lineup and reserve-center competition shape preseason rotations.

Reguli NBA: câștigătoarea, handicapul și totalurile pe tot meciul includ prelungirile. Rezultatul după 48 de minute, reprizele și sferturile nu le includ.

Predicții experimentale: acuratețea nu a fost încă validată pe rezultate istorice.

Probabilități BetBugs

Cât de probabil considera BetBugs fiecare rezultat.

Rezultat4 din 10 corecte

Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
Washington won all three sampled road second quarters, including a 39-26 margin at New York. Their average second-quarter scoring is well above New York’s, supporting a strong away edge.
- New York’s home second quarters include a 34-point performance, so they can compete.
- The Wizards’ reported frontcourt injuries could affect their second-quarter production.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 2 · RezultatpierdutWashington WizardsȘansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
The away side must win the second quarter by six or more. Washington achieved that in two of three sampled road second quarters (+13 and +7), supporting a higher cover probability.
- The +5 margin against New York would not cover -5.5.
- New York’s 34-point second quarter shows they can keep the margin close.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 2 · HandicappierdutWashington Wizards -5.5Șansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
The away side covers +0.5 if it wins or ties the third quarter. Washington won one of three sampled road third quarters and the other two were losses by nine, so the +0.5 cover is favored but not certain.
- If New York wins the third quarter, Washington +0.5 fails.
- Washington’s two nine-point losses show they can also lose the quarter.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 3 · HandicapcâștigatWashington Wizards +0.5Șansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare · Fără cotă
Explicația
The home side gets 6.5 points, meaning it covers if it loses by six or fewer or wins outright. In the sampled first halves, New York lost by six once (38-44) and won by 10 once, while Washington’s road first halves included losses by six and margins under seven. This makes the home cover more likely.
- Washington won the direct first half by 23 points, easily covering -6.5.
- New York’s first-half scoring can be low enough to lose by more than six.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Prima repriză · HandicapcâștigatNew York Knicks +6.5Șansă estimată60%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare · Fără cotă
Explicația
Washington won one sampled road third quarter and lost two close ones, while New York lost all three home third quarters. The away side is favored, but the margins were small, limiting confidence.
- New York’s third quarters were decided by 2, 2, and 2 points, so the away edge is fragile.
- Washington’s 27-36 loss to Detroit shows they can also lose the quarter.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 3 · RezultatcâștigatWashington WizardsȘansă estimată60%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
Washington’s sampled first-half road scores (51, 75, 53) and their decisive 75-52 first-half lead in the direct matchup support the away side as the more likely first-half winner.
- New York’s 64-point first half shows they can flip the half at home.
- The Wizards’ reported frontcourt absences could reduce their first-half scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Prima repriză · RezultatpierdutWashington WizardsȘansă estimată55%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
Historical same-stage preseason data shows the Knicks went 2-1 in these sampled home games while the Wizards went 1-2 in sampled road games, though the teams split their direct meeting with Washington winning 120-103. The designated home venue Madison Square Garden and continuity from a reported settled Knicks rotation give a slight edge to New York, but preseason variability and incomplete current role information keep confidence low.
- The Wizards won the most recent sampled head-to-head preseason game at New York by 17 points, and their reported camp additions (Anthony Davis, Trae Young) could make them more competitive.
- Veterans may play limited preseason minutes, which can flip outcomes unpredictably.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Tot meciul · Câștigătoare · Incl. prelungiripierdutNew York KnicksȘansă estimată54%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
With a +0.5 handicap including overtime, the home side covers if it wins outright. The same evidence as the overall winner applies, giving a slight edge to New York.
- Washington won the direct sampled matchup and could cover as underdog.
- Preseason rotation changes can alter the final margin.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Tot meciul · Handicap · Incl. prelungiripierdutNew York Knicks +0.5Șansă estimată54%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Aproape coin-flip · Fără cotă
Explicația
In regulation, the sampled preseason games rarely produced ties, but Washington’s direct win over New York suggests a close regulation margin. The Knicks’ slight home edge is offset by the possibility of a tie, so regulation home win is assessed just below the overall win probability.
- The Knicks could win regulation outright and avoid overtime, raising their regulation win probability.
- Washington’s reported offensive additions could push them ahead in regulation.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Tot meciul · Rezultat după 48 minpierdutNew York KnicksȘansă estimată50%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Aproape coin-flip · Fără cotă
Explicația
Washington’s sampled road first quarters included a 36-point outburst and two low-scoring quarters, but New York’s home first quarters were mostly modest. The away side is assessed a slight edge.
- New York won the first quarter in their most recent sampled home game.
- Washington’s first-quarter scoring can be volatile.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 1 · RezultatcâștigatWashington WizardsȘansă estimată50%

Puncte7 din 15 corecte

Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
Washington scored 33, 39, and 33 in sampled road second quarters, all above the 32.5 line. Their average of 35 is comfortably above, making over the strongly favored outcome.
- One of the three was exactly 33, only half a point above the line, so a small shift could flip it.
- Reported injuries could reduce their second-quarter scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 2 · Puncte Washington WizardspierdutWashington Wizards · Peste 32.5Șansă estimată90%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
All three sampled Knicks third quarters finished under 28.5, making the under the strongly favored outcome.
- New York’s third-quarter scores were close to 28.5, so a small increase could flip the result.
- A high-scoring third quarter is possible in preseason.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 3 · Puncte New York KnickscâștigatNew York Knicks · Sub 28.5Șansă estimată90%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
All three sampled Wizards road third quarters finished under 27.5, making the under the strongly favored outcome.
- The 27-point quarter was only half a point under the line, so a small shift could flip it.
- Preseason scoring can spike in the third quarter.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 3 · Puncte Washington WizardscâștigatWashington Wizards · Sub 27.5Șansă estimată90%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
Two of three sampled Knicks first halves finished under 52.5, and their average is below the line. The under is the more supported outcome.
- The Knicks have a reported settled rotation and could score efficiently early.
- Preseason first halves can be high-scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Prima repriză · Puncte New York KnickspierdutNew York Knicks · Sub 52.5Șansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
Two of three sampled Knicks first quarters were at or below 26.5, and the average is below the line. The under is the more likely outcome.
- New York’s 30-point first quarter shows over potential.
- Preseason first quarters can be high-scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 1 · Puncte New York KnickspierdutNew York Knicks · Sub 26.5Șansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
Two of three sampled Wizards road first quarters finished under 26.5, and their average is below the line. The under is the more supported outcome.
- Washington’s 36-point first quarter shows high upside.
- New York’s first-quarter defense may be permissive in preseason.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 1 · Puncte Washington WizardspierdutWashington Wizards · Sub 26.5Șansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare puternică · Fără cotă
Explicația
Two of three sampled Knicks second quarters finished at or below 26.5, and the average is slightly under the line. The under is the more supported outcome.
- New York’s 34-point second quarter shows they can exceed the line.
- Preseason defenses may allow more scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 2 · Puncte New York KnickspierdutNew York Knicks · Sub 26.5Șansă estimată65%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
New York’s sampled scoring output was below 108.5 in two of three games, and their average was just over 105. The under is the more likely outcome given that historical baseline, though current roster integration could change their scoring.
- The Knicks have a reported settled starting lineup and could score efficiently at home.
- Preseason games sometimes feature higher scoring with relaxed defense.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Tot meciul · Puncte New York Knicks · Incl. prelungiripierdutNew York Knicks · Sub 108.5Șansă estimată58%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
Two of three sampled Wizards road first halves were under 58.5, and the 75-point outlier pulls the average up. The under is given a modest edge.
- Washington’s 75-point first half shows they can exceed the line comfortably.
- New York’s defense may be less intense in preseason, allowing more scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Prima repriză · Puncte Washington WizardscâștigatWashington Wizards · Sub 58.5Șansă estimată55%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
Sampled preseason totals for these teams clustered around 217, with Knicks games at 221, 223, and 195, and Wizards games at 217, 223, and 225. The line sits near the observed average, so over is assigned a very slight edge, but the small sample and unknown current scoring roles keep confidence low.
- Two of the six sampled games finished below 217.5, and preseason scoring can drop with limited veteran minutes.
- Roster changes and injuries could reduce offensive efficiency.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Tot meciul · Total puncte · Incl. prelungiricâștigatPeste 217.5Șansă estimată52%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Înclinare ușoară · Fără cotă
Explicația
Washington scored 98, 120, and 112 in the sampled road games, averaging about 110. That places them slightly above the 108.5 line on average, so over gets a small edge.
- Two of three sampled Wizards road games finished below 120, and one was only 98.
- Reported injuries to Vukcevic and Sarr’s ramp-up could limit their scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Tot meciul · Puncte Washington Wizards · Incl. prelungiricâștigatWashington Wizards · Peste 108.5Șansă estimată52%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Aproape coin-flip · Fără cotă
Explicația
The under is slightly favored because two sampled first halves were very low (82 and 105) and the average is just under the line. However, the presence of multiple high-scoring halves makes this a weak lean.
- Two sampled first halves reached 127 total points, well above the line.
- Preseason games can feature high first-half scoring due to relaxed defense.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Prima repriză · Total punctepierdutSub 111.5Șansă estimată51%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Aproape coin-flip · Fără cotă
Explicația
Sampled first-quarter totals averaged around 53, with values like 59, 62, 41, 47, 62, and 46. The over is marginally favored because the average is just above the line.
- Three of six sampled first quarters finished under 52.5.
- Preseason first quarters can start slowly.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 1 · Total punctecâștigatPeste 52.5Șansă estimată51%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Aproape coin-flip · Fără cotă
Explicația
The under is marginally favored because the average is just under the line and one sampled quarter was very low (41). However, the presence of multiple 65-point quarters makes this a weak lean.
- Two sampled second quarters reached 65 points, well above the line.
- Preseason second quarters can be high-scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 2 · Total punctepierdutSub 58.5Șansă estimată51%
Calitate semnal Scăzută · Bandă de incertitudine Aproape coin-flip · Fără cotă
Explicația
The under is marginally favored because the average is just under the line and two sampled quarters were very low (48). However, the presence of multiple 60-point quarters makes this a weak lean.
- Two sampled third quarters reached 61 and 63 points, well above the line.
- Preseason third quarters can be high-scoring.
- NBA normal forecasts are experimental; held-out calibration and live editorial acceptance remain pending.
- Historical scoring is evidence, not a calibrated probability distribution or a confirmed current rotation.
- Designated home status does not establish home-court advantage; preseason venue defaults can be wrong.
- Small same-stage scoring sample; confidence remains LOW.
BetBugs · Sfertul 3 · Total punctecâștigatSub 55.5Șansă estimată51%

V145–113

New York Knicksv

Washington Wizards

Mar 22, 2026·SEZ

Î103–120

New York Knicksv

Washington Wizards

Oct 13, 2025·PRE

240.5Medie puncte totale

24.5Diferență medie

2întâlniri

Clasament

NBA · sezonul regulat 2026–27

Clasamentul pentru 2026–27 nu este disponibil de la furnizor.

Formă recentă

New York Knicks

15V 8Î · ultimele 23

vs Charlotte Hornets96–110 Apr 12SEZ

vs Toronto Raptors112–95 Apr 10SEZ

vs Boston Celtics112–106 Apr 9SEZ

la Atlanta Hawks108–105 Apr 6SEZ

vs Chicago Bulls136–96 Apr 3SEZ

la Memphis Grizzlies130–119 Apr 2SEZ

la Houston Rockets94–111 Apr 1SEZ

la Oklahoma City Thunder100–111 Mar 29SEZ

la Charlotte Hornets103–114 Mar 26SEZ

vs New Orleans Pelicans121–116 Mar 24SEZ

vs Washington Wizards145–113 Mar 22SEZ

la Brooklyn Nets93–92 Mar 20SEZ

vs Indiana Pacers136–110 Mar 17SEZ

vs Golden State Warriors110–107 Mar 16SEZ

la Indiana Pacers101–92 Mar 13SEZ

la Utah Jazz134–117 Mar 12SEZ

la LA Clippers118–126 Mar 10SEZ

la Los Angeles Lakers97–110 Mar 8SEZ

la Denver Nuggets142–103 Mar 7SEZ

vs Oklahoma City Thunder100–103 Mar 5SEZ

vs Charlotte Hornets113–108 Oct 17PRE

vs Washington Wizards103–120 Oct 13PRE

vs Minnesota Timberwolves100–95 PROct 9PRE

Washington Wizards

2V 21Î · ultimele 23

la Cleveland Cavaliers117–130 Apr 12SEZ

vs Miami Heat117–140 Apr 10SEZ

vs Chicago Bulls108–119 Apr 9SEZ

vs Chicago Bulls98–129 Apr 7SEZ

la Brooklyn Nets115–121 Apr 5SEZ

la Miami Heat136–152 Apr 4SEZ

vs Philadelphia 76ers131–153 Apr 1SEZ

la Los Angeles Lakers101–120 Mar 31SEZ

la Portland Trail Blazers88–123 Mar 29SEZ

la Golden State Warriors126–131 Mar 28SEZ

la Utah Jazz133–110 Mar 26SEZ

la New York Knicks113–145 Mar 22SEZ

vs Oklahoma City Thunder111–132 Mar 21SEZ

vs Detroit Pistons95–117 Mar 19SEZ

vs Detroit Pistons117–130 Mar 17SEZ

vs Golden State Warriors117–125 Mar 16SEZ

la Boston Celtics100–111 Mar 14SEZ

la Orlando Magic131–136 PRMar 12SEZ

la Miami Heat129–150 Mar 10SEZ

la New Orleans Pelicans118–138 Mar 8SEZ

la Detroit Pistons98–119 Oct 16PRE

la New York Knicks120–103 Oct 13PRE

vs Toronto Raptors112–113 Oct 12PRE

Duelul statisticilor

Ultimele 15 meciuri · toate competițiile

New York Knicks

23 meciuri

Statistici

4–1

Washington Wizards

23 meciuri

New York Knicks conduce la 4 din 5 statistici de performanță.

Aruncări· 2–1

% aruncări de 2+3.2pp

57.3%

+3.2pp

54.1%

% aruncări de 3+0.7pp

35.5%

+0.7pp

36.2%

% aruncări libere+4.5pp

80.7%

+4.5pp

76.2%

Surse de puncte· stil, fără clasament

Puncte din aruncări de 3diferență de 0.7 pp

34.1%

diferență de 0.7 pp

34.8%

Aruncări libere per aruncarediferență de 1.8 pp

23.0%

diferență de 1.8 pp

24.8%

Posesie· 2–0

Recuperări pe meci+4.2

44.5

+4.2

40.3

Mingi pierdute pe mecicu 2.3 mai puține

14.0

cu 2.3 mai puține

16.3

Barele arată valorile. Sursele de puncte descriu stilul; mai puține mingi pierdute înseamnă mai bine. Marcajele arată datele lipsă.

Unele informații istorice sau actuale sunt incomplete. Verifică dovezile și incertitudinile fiecărei predicții; loturile și minutele de joc se pot schimba.