Brann33 – 0Ham-Kam0

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

Brann's strong H2H dominance and better home form outweigh Ham-Kam's poor away record, making a home win the most likely outcome.

• Brann home record: 4W-0D-4L, 14 goals for, 13 against in 8 home matches
• Ham-Kam away record: 1W-3D-4L, 10 goals for, 15 against in 8 away matches
• H2H: Brann unbeaten in last 7 meetings, won 6, including 5-1 away in April 2026

BetBugs · Match WinnerwonBrannEstimated chance55%

Signal quality High · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Given Brann's historical dominance and Ham-Kam's away struggles, Brann avoiding defeat is highly likely.

• Brann unbeaten in last 7 H2H meetings (6W, 1D)
• Ham-Kam away record: only 1 win in 8 away matches
• Brann home record: 4 wins and 4 losses, no draws, but strong overall H2H

BetBugs · Double ChancewonBrann or DrawEstimated chance80%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Brann's tendency to start strongly and Ham-Kam's slow starts make a Brann halftime lead likely.

• Brann led at halftime in 53% of matches, Ham-Kam trailed at halftime in 47%
• Brann average 0.9 first-half goals vs Ham-Kam's 0.5
• In last 5 H2H, Brann led at halftime in 3 matches

BetBugs · First Half WinnerwonBrannEstimated chance45%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Brann's ability to take early leads and maintain them against Ham-Kam supports a HT/FT double.

• Brann led at halftime in 53% of matches and won 44% overall
• Ham-Kam trailed at halftime in 47% and lost 38% overall
• H2H: Brann won 6 of last 7, often controlling from early

BetBugs · Ht Ft DoublewonBrann/BrannEstimated chance40%

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams have shown attacking intent and defensive vulnerabilities, with recent H2H meetings producing high-scoring games.

• Brann average 2.0 goals scored per match overall, 1.75 at home
• Ham-Kam average 1.5 goals scored and 1.3 conceded per match overall
• Last H2H: 5-1 Brann win, and 3 of last 5 H2H had over 2.5 goals

Signal quality High · Uncertainty band Strong lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams tend to score or concede in the first half, with Brann often taking early leads.

• Brann average 0.9 first-half goals, Ham-Kam average 0.5 first-half goals
• Brann led at halftime in 53% of matches, Ham-Kam trailed at halftime in 47%
• In last 5 H2H, first-half goals occurred in 4 matches

Signal quality Medium · Uncertainty band Slight lean · Not priced

The read

Both teams tend to be more productive in the second half, with Brann's attacking depth likely to create chances late.

• Brann average 1.1 second-half goals (2.0 total - 0.9 first half)
• Ham-Kam average 1.0 second-half goals (1.5 total - 0.5 first half)
• Combined average second-half goals: 2.1

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Brann's attacking style and home advantage could push total corners above the line, though Ham-Kam's low corner count adds uncertainty.

• Brann average 5.3 corners per match, Ham-Kam average 3.6
• Combined average corners: 8.9, but Brann's home matches often see more
• Last H2H: Brann had 6 corners, Ham-Kam 4 (total 10)

Signal quality Low · Uncertainty band Near coin-flip · Not priced

The read

Both teams generate a moderate number of shots on target, and the total could exceed 8.5 if the game opens up.

• Brann average 4.2 shots on target per match, Ham-Kam average 4.5
• Combined average shots on target: 8.7
• Brann's home matches average 4.5 shots on target for, 4.0 against